Judging Rubric - Experimental

 

  15-20 10-14 5-9 0-4
Clear Hypothesis Concept clearly explained in presentation. Concept relevant in terms of practical application. Hypothesis clearly reflects a need. Concept explained in presentation. Concept of practical application. Hypothesis reflects a need. Concept explained in presentation. Concept not very practical application. Hypothesis somewhat reflects a need. Concept is not explained in presentation. Concept irrelevant in terms of practical application. Hypothesis does not reflect a need.
Scientific process (Data/Results/Analysis) Authentic collection of experimental data. Graphed/ tabulated results. Mention of errors. Detailed analysis of results. A collection of experimental data. Graphed/ tabulated results briefly. Some mention of errors. An analysis of results. Some experimental data. Graphed/ tabulated results. Brief analysis of results. Some experimental data. Graphed/ tabulated results.. No analysis of results.
Content/Details Well-researched information, cited clearly. Information relevant and comprehensive. Researched information, cited fairly clearly. Information relevant and Researched information, cited. Information relevant. Not well-researched information, not cited clearly. Information irrelevant
Difficulty/Originality Futuristic applications defined. Information interesting and above grade level. Concept original and current. Concept enriching for the grade level scientist.. Information interesting and at grade level. Concept current. Concept somewhat enriching for the grade level scientist. Information at grade level.. Concept relevant for the grade level scientist. Information below grade level. Concept irrelevant for the grade level scientist.
Presentation/Interview High level of Confidence in responding. General knowledge related to the project clarity of the thought process Attractive, eye-catching Poster design. Detailed write-up in log book. A little more or less than 5 minutes. Quite clearly explain concept, some clarity in thought process, research and significance of project. Clear explanation of the scientific process. Much more or less than 5 minutes. Not clearly explain concept, unclear thought process, some thought towards thought process, research and significance of project. Attempts explanation of the scientific process Not prepared to present. Confused explanation of concept, confused thought process, research and significance of project. Cannot explain the scientific process

 

Judging Rubric-Demonstration

  15-20 10-14 41038 0-4
1. Appearance/Design Attractive, eye-catching Poster design. Sturdy, model, supporting presentation. Detailed write-up in log book. Attractive, Poster design. Model, supporting presentation. Some detailed write-up in log book. Filled Poster design. No model, Few features supporting presentation. Brief write-up in log book. Scanty Poster design. No model, Very few features supporting presentation. No log book.
2.Concepts/Applications Concept clearly explained in presentation. Concept relevant in terms of practical application. Futuristic applications defined. Concept explained in presentation. Concept has some practical application. Some Futuristic applications defined. Concept explained. Concept has little practical application. Few Futuristic applications defined. Concept not explained in presentation. Concept irrelevant in terms of practical application. No futuristic applications defined.
3.Content/Details Well-researched information, cited clearly. Information relevant and comprehensive. Researched information, cited fairly clearly. Information relevant and comprehensive. Researched information, cited. Information relevant. Not well-researched information not cited clearly. Information irrelevant
4.Difficulty/Originality Information interesting and above grade level. Concept original and current. Concept enriching for the grade level scientist. Information interesting and at grade level. Concept current. Concept somewhat enriching for the grade level scientist. Information at grade level.. Concept relevant for the grade level scientist. Information below grade level. Concept irrelevant for the grade level scientist.
5.Presentation/Interview 5 minutes. Clearly, confidently, explain concept, clear thought process, research and significance of project. A little more or less than 5 minutes. Quite clearly explain concept, some clarity in thought process, research and significance of project. Much more or less than 5 minutes. Not clearly explain concept, unclear thought process, some thought towards thought process, research and significance of project. Not prepared to present. Confused explanation of concept, confused thought process, research and significance of project.